Judge for yourselves! #EuGlobalStrategy update - reason for gloom or optimism? https://t.co/3g3hdpt0ub pic.twitter.com/dNwlLGLpZM
— On security/Lundin (@londil) April 30, 2016
My view: Yes in the sense that it covers most of the issues that EU citizens are concerned about. No in the sense that it is formally delimited to foreign and security policy. Yes, again in the sense that the Lisbon treaty provides a very broad scope to this definition. No, finally, in sense that there is a legitimate worry that the strategy will not be well linked up with internal security, with the Commission and most of all with member States. For that a lot of work has to be done. Read more about that below!.
|
|
Stay tuned: stunning new 3D presentations for e-learning purposes on the #EUGlobalstrategy
|
|
|
|
HR/VP on the #EUGlobalstrategy in Paris - Video https://t.co/LtJgn2iJnd pic.twitter.com/NX7TUPTJZs
— On security/Lundin (@londil) April 25, 2016
The precursor to the strategy: the 2015 Strategic Review
|
MY VIEWS
Seeing the links between terrorism, organized crime, other good and bad flows the conflict cycle , perceptions, values, corruption and assistance essential for strategy and a comprehensive approachHearing by the House of Lords Committee - my part starts around 10:50
Swedish language blog entry - click on pictureMy view on the comprehensive approach as published in the Spring 2015 SEcurity Jam reportWith reference to the Iran negotiations: developing the power to open doors should be an essential target in the EU strategic reviewMy comment to Missiroli/EUISS and FIOTT/Eurostrategy: Agree with Fiott that comprehensive approach requires prioritization. "Multi-" cannot be enough to focus efforts. But focus should in the case of the EU be on opening doors. This is the key gap for the foreseeable future. The Iran case shows that the EU can do a lot.
|
The full text of the EU strategic review:
CLICK ON THE MAP TO EXPLORE how the strategic review document deals with some of the key policy perspectives involved - or check out different heading of this website :
EU global strategy process as mandated by the European Council for delivery in 2016:
- SCOPE (COMPREHENSIVENESS)?
- PARADIGMS: SOFT/HARD?
- INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL?
- INCLUDING MIGRATION, TRAFFICKING, ENERGY, CYBER AND OTHER FLOWS?
- PRIORITIES:GLOBAL/REGIONAL, EAST/SOUTH?
- WHO WILL STEER (MOGHERINI ALONE?)?
- WILL THE FUTURE STRATEGY REALLY BE GLOBAL?
- WILL IT REALLY BE OPERATIONAL?
- WILL THERE BE A CHANCE FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE DEBATE?
Three parallell approaches proposed to the European Council June 2015:
|
|
|
|
|